1 2026:CGHC:18117 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1774 of 2026 1 - Parikshit Haldar S/o Babulal Aged About 60 Years R/o Village - Padega, Tahsil - Bande, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh 2 - Sushil Sarkar S/o Sunil Sarkar Aged About 34 Years R/o Village - Padega, Tahsil - Bande, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh 3 - The Tahsildar Bande, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Krishnakant Prajapati, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 21.4.2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the records pertaining to the case from the respondent authorities. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set- aside/quash the impugned dispossession warrant dated 08.04.2026 (Annexure P/1) and further be pleased to direct the respondents not to remove the petitioners from their houses. BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.04.22 14:26:46 +0530 2 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief which may be deem fit in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case including cost of litigation. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that eviction warrant (Annexure-P/1) issued by the Tahsildar, Bande, Distt. North Bastar, Kanker has been acted upon, therefore, present petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the State also conceded the above submission of the counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the above contention of learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini