Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 69476 (MAD)

DIVYA BHARATHI v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police

CRL OP/4112/2026 · 2026-02-19

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.4112 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.4112 of 2026 Divya Bharathi ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Arcot Town Police Station, Ranipet District. Crime No.277 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.277 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.Thirumoorthy D For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.4112 of 2026 O R D E R The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2), 316(5), 318(4) and 49 of BNS Act, 2023 in Crime No.277 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner/A2 is that she was working in a finance company in various capacities and, along with other staff, colluded, by forging documents, misusing the gold jewels pledged in other accounts, and by using spurious/fictitious gold, misappropriated a sum of Rs.37.37 lakhs. Apprehending arrest, the petitioner has filed the present petition seeking anticipatory bail. 3. It is seen that, this is the second anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner, earlier petitioner’s anticipatory bail petition was dismissed by stating the following reasons: Considering the manner in which the occurrence has taken place and the fact that no amount has been recovered so far, this Court is of the view that if anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, there is likelihood of tampering with the investigation. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.4112 of 2026 Now, without any change in circumstances, present petition is filed. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 19.02.2026 sma To 1. The Inspector of Police, Arcot Town Police Station, Ranipet District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.4112 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR, J. sma Crl.O.P.No.4112 of 2026 19.02.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis