Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6946 (RAJ)

SAHIB KHAN S/O SHOKAT KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/141/2026 · 2026-05-08

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:19525-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 141/2026 Sahib Khan S/o Shokat Khan, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Sayra Colony, Mohalla Kotla,police Station Kotwali, District Dholpur ,rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur. 3. SHO, Police Station Kotwali, District Dholpur. 4. Ajit Meena @ Chhotu @ Chilab @ Arvind S/o Hariram Meena, R/o Kakrer, P.s. Sarmathura, District Dholpur Currently Residing At Village Bansi Ka Bagh, Rampur, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, Dy.G.A. Mr. Veerendra Singh, S.I., SHO Kotwali, Dholpur Ms. Nisha, FC Belt No. 505, P.S. Kotwali, Dholpur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 08/05/2026 1. This habeas corpus petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner–Sahib Khan. 2. Today, the concerned Officer has produced the corpus before us. Admittedly, the corpus is major, more than 20 years of age and this fact has been confirmed by counsel for the petitioner as [2026:RJ-JP:19525-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-141/2026] well as by learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General. 3. We have interacted with the corpus and she has firmly stated before us that she is not in any illegal detention and she does not want to go with the petitioner (her brother). 5. Considering the statement made by the corpus before us and the fact that the corpus is major, we set the corpus at liberty to go and live as per her own free will. 6. The concerned police officer is directed to make sure that no harm is caused to the corpus while going at the place of her choice. 7. In that view of the matter, this habeas corpus petition stands dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Ritu/2