Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.5909 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.No.5909 of 2026 Natarajan .. Petitioner vs the Joint I Sub Registrar, O/o.the Joint I Sub Registrar, Gobichettipalayam – Post and Taluk, Erode District. .. Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the refusal check slip in Refusal Number:RFL/Joint I Sub Registrar Gobichettipalayam/38/2025 (RFL 1 vz; ,iz rhh;gjpthsh; nfhgpbrl;og;ghisak;/38/2025) on the file of the Joint I Sub Registrar, Gobichettipalayam/respondent dated 10.11.2025 and quash the same and further direct the Joint I Sub Registrar, Gobichettipalayam/respondent to admit and register the sale deed dated 10.11.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Prabhakaran For Respondent : Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.5909 of 2026
ORDER One Mr.S.S.Thangavel, filed O.S.No.233 of 2014 before the District Munsif, Gobichettiplayam against the petitioner's father. The suit was decreed. E.P.No.11 of 2014 was filed by the decree holder against the petitioner's mother, sister and the petitioner. An order of attachment of the immovable property was issued on 18.01.2016. Thereafter, the petitioner states that the entire decretal amount was paid to the decree holder and E.P.No.11 of 2014 was terminated.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the order of the executing Court recording full satisfaction and contended that in spite of the same, the petitioner's request to register the sale deed was declined.
3. Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for the sole respondent.
4. The petitioner has placed on record order dated 05.03.2021 in E.P.No.11 of 2014. Said order records categorically that the entire amount due and payable under the decree had been paid and that full satisfaction was being recorded. As a consequence, the earlier
order of attachment does not survive. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.5909 of 2026
5. On examining the impugned refusal check slip, it is noticeable that the only ground for refusal is order of attachment. Taking note of the termination of the execution petition on account of full satisfaction, the impugned refusal check slip cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside.
6. Consequently, the petitioner is permitted to re-present the sale deed dated 10.11.2025. Within two weeks of such re- presentation, subject to fulfillment of other requirements relating to registration, the registering officer shall register the document.
7. This writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. 26.02.2026 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No mmi To 1.The District Collector, Collector Office, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Special Tahsildar (LA), Housing Scheme TNHB, Hosur, Krishnagiri District – 635 109. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.5909 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J. mmi W.P.No.5909 of 2026 26.02.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis