[2026:RJ-JP:21395] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6024/2026 Vijayram Meena S/o Gangadhar Meena, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dhandela Ki Jhopdi, Gajpura Sapotra, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asad Ul Haq Nooree, Adv. with Mr. Krishan Kumar Mahar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 20/05/2026 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.311/2025, registered at Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East), for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 140(3) and 303(2) of BNS, the accused-petitioner has preferred this criminal miscellaneous bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that in the FIR it is alleged that the petitioner along with other co-accused attacked the complainant with the aid of knife, however, the injured did not receive any injury and the allegations that the petitioner took the mobile phone of the complainant is also incorrect. It is further contended that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation [2026:RJ-JP:21395] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6024/2026] and there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, therefore, his anticipatory bail application may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail application and submitted the factual report. 4. Heard and perused material available on record. 5. In the FIR, it is stated that the petitioner along with the other co-accused attacked the complainant- Chetram with the aid of knife and thereafter, Hariom Meena snatched the phone from the complainant and handed over to the present petitioner. The complainant- Chetram Meena did not receive any injury and the allegation of snatching the mobile phone is against the other co- accused Hariom Meena, who has already been enlarged on regular bail by the trial Court, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioner- Vijayram Meena S/o Gangadhar Meena, in connection with FIR No.311/2025, registered at Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East), he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case [2026:RJ-JP:21395] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6024/2026] so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava/-79