Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6944 (JHR)

SURAJ KUMAR RAWANI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1636/2026 · 2026-04-22

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:11726 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1636 of 2026 ------ Suraj Kumar Rawani, son of Shiv Prasad Rawani, resident of near Sankat Mochan Mandir, Phularitand, P.O. Jharia, P.S. Jharia, District Dhanbad .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate Mr. Raj Kumar Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. ------ 02/22.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jorapokhar P.S. Case No. 140 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the allegations are made of withdrawing Rs.1,50,000/-. He next submits that the co-accused, who has kept the cheque of the father of the informant, has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.8072 of 2024 and other co-accused persons have also have been granted anticipatory bail A.B.A. No.260 of 2025 and A.B.A. No.8014 of 2024 and through the said cheque, different transactions have been taken place. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of withdrawal of money by using forged Aadhar card. 5. Considering that the allegations are there against other co-accused persons of withdrawing the amount and informant himself has stated that his brother has misappropriated the cheque book of his father through Devendra Kumar Nonia, who has been granted anticipatory bail and other co-accused persons have also been granted anticipatory bail by this court and in that view of the matter, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 23.04.2026