Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 69397 (MAD)

R.Manoharan,No.3/24,Maikandar v. The Directorate of Handlooms &

WP/20230/2018 · 2026-01-20

Hemant Chandangoudar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.20230 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.No.20230 of 2018 R.Manoharan ... Petitioner vs. 1. The Directorate of Handlooms and Textiles Rep. By its Directorate Kuralagam, 2nd Floor Chennai-600 108 and another … Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Balan Haridas For Respondents : Ms.S.Rajeni Ramadass, for R1 Mr.R.Ramanlal Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.R.Sanjay Gandhi Additional Government Pleader, for R2 ***** O R D E R This Court, vide order dated 20.01.2026 disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.33,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Three Lakhs Only) to the petitioner on or before 23.02.2026. Page Nos.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20230 of 2018 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that only a sum of Rs.27,07,200/- has been deposited instead of full amount of Rs.33,00,000/- as ordered by this Court. 3. The learned State Counsel submits that the said amount has been paid after deducting tax at source. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Cont P.No.989 of 2020, wherein in respect of an identical claim, this Court held that there is no impediment for deducting the provident fund contribution as per the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Income Tax Rules, 1962. However, it is made clear that TDS amount need not be deducted and appropriate application is to be filed before the Income Tax Department for necessary orders. Thus, it is made clear that the respondent shall not deduct TDS from backwages to be settled in favour of the petitioner therein. Page Nos.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20230 of 2018 5. In view of the above, the deduction of TDS from the amount payable to the petitioner is impermissible. The respondent is hereby directed to pay the balance amount of Rs.5,92,800/- deducted towards TDS on or before the next date of hearing. 6. Post the matter on 03.03.2026 for reporting compliance. 23.02.2026 mk Page Nos.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20230 of 2018 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mk W.P.No.20230 of 2018 23.02.2026 Page Nos.4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis