IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 244 & 548/2026 Decided on: 07.01.2026 1. CWP No. 244/2026 Nivedita Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 2. CWP No. 548/2026 Rakesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s): Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate in both the matters. For the respondent(s): Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General in both the matters. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents in both the matters. 2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 applicability of Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the petitioner(s) would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in case of Mohit Sharma2, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 7th January, 2026(rohit) 2CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024