WP No. 4935 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 4935 of 2026 ofD WMP No. 5509 OF 2026,WMP No. 5510 of 2026 Mani.R S/o Raghuraman, X-19,Prakasam Street, Gangakaraipuram, C-Block T. Nagar, Chennai 600 017 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Government Of Tamil Nadu Represented by its secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 2. The Chiarman Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, presently Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, Chennai 600 005 3. The Executive Engineer Division -4 Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, Chennai 600 018 ..Respondent(s) Calling for the records of the general impugned notice dated 09.01.2026 pasted by the 3rd respondent quash the same and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4935 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 consequentially to direct the Respondents to consider the Judgement and Decree passed by the Honble XVIII Asst. City Civil Court in O.S. No 8702/ 1981 to 8705/ 1981, 8705/1981, 8707/ 1981, 8708/1981, 9011/1981, 9012/1981, 9013/1981, 9015/1981 dated 28.01.1985 and 02.03.1985 passed in favour of the petitioner in accordance with law, and pass WP No. 4935 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Mohanavadivelan For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arunkumar,AGP for R1 Mr.B.Balaji, Standing Counsel for TNUHDB for R2 & R3 Order (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Writ Petition has been instituted challenging the notice issued by the Tamilnadu Urban Habitat Development Board for eviction of encroachers from the boundaries of tenament, since it is causing obstructions to the tenament as well as the public at large and to construct a new block by demolishing the existing structures. 2. The petitioner has already instituted a Civil Suit and a decree came to be issued. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the execution petition has also been filed. Under these circumstances, the present writ petition is not maintainable. 3. However, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Tamilnadu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4935 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 Urban Rehabitat Development Board would submit that the petitioner is found eligible and allotment order has been issued to the petitioner. That being the factum, the writ petition is unnecessary. Hence, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 20-02-2026 VSI To 1.The Government Of Tamil Nadu Represented by its secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 2.The Chiarman Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, presently Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, Chennai 600 005 3.The Executive Engineer Division -4 Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, Chennai 600 018 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4935 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN J. VSI WP No. 4935 of 2026 20-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis