Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 69360 (MAD)

R.MANI @ MANIGANDAN v. The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/4446/2026 · 2026-02-23

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.4446 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.4446 of 2026 R.Mani @ Manigandan ... Petitioner Vs. The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Poonamallee Police Station Chennai. Crime No.57 of 2026 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest pending investigation in connection with Crime No.57 of 2026 on the file of Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balasubramanian For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.4446 of 2026 O R D E R The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B), 25 and 29(1) of NDPS Act, in Crime No.57 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is ranked as A3 in this case. It is alleged that the petitioner along with other accused were found in possession of 1.100 kgs of ganja . Hence, the case was registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that based on the confession of A1 and A2, petitioner has been arrested.. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that A1 & A2 has been arrested in this case and the investigation revealed that petitioner is supplier and have played active role in possession and transportation of ganja. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.4446 of 2026 5.Considering the nature of allegations and the fact that it is a case of intermediate quantity of ganja and the petitioner is a main accused, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 23.02.2026 sma To 1. The Inspector of Police, Poonamallee Police Station Chennai. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.4446 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR, J. sma Crl.O.P.No.4446 of 2026 23.02.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis