Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6935 (KAR)

ANANDKUMAR v. SMT. KAMALAMMA

CRP/459/2022 · 2026-02-25

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11917 CRP No. 459 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 459 OF 2022 (SC) BETWEEN: ANANDKUMAR S/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS SHOP NO. 26, (OLD NO.18/1) 2ND FLOOR, HOSPITAL ROAD NEAR MENAKA THEATRE BENGALURU - 560 053. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA B. HARALI GOWDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. KAMALAMMA W/O LATE PRABHAKAR P.M, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT 'SAHI NILAYA' 10TH MAIN ROAD, MUNESHWARA LAYOUT RAMAMURTHY NAGARA BENGALURU - 560 016. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ASHOK N. PATIL, ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED U/S 18 OF KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSES COURT ACT,1964, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 08.01.2021 PASSED IN SC.NO.1259/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11917 CRP No. 459 of 2022 III ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the prayer in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous, since the respondent has taken possession of the suit schedule property in terms of the orders passed by the Executing Court. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Consequently, the Civil Revision petition stands disposed of in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0