Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:19060] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3714/2026 Navet Koli S/o Frances Koli, R/o Room No. 304, Karari Chawal Masjid Road, Kararai Raise Meel Ke Pass, Sopara Gao Takipada, Nalsopra West Thana Maharashtra, At Present Spanish Villa Basai Claster No. 4 Villa No. 5 Ground Or-One Chinchoti Nayagao, Thana Nayagao East Distt. Wasai East, Mumbai. (At Present Confined At Distt. Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Accused Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Hasan, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Aquif Khan & Mr. Ishan Raj Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 06/05/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 454/2024 registered at Police Station Guda, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Section(s) 420 and 406 IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is behind the bars since 27.01.2026. He also submits that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed. He further submits that the alleged offence(s) is triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner
[2026:RJ-JP:19060] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3714/2026] in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 27.01.2026; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed; that the alleged offence(s) is triable by Magistrate and trial is likely to take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Navet Koli S/o Frances Koli is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
[2026:RJ-JP:19060] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3714/2026]
7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /16