Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6932 (UTT)

PRATIBHA RAWAT v. K S FARSWAN

CLCON/312/2026 · 2026-06-16

Pankaj Purohit

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CLCON No.312 of 2026 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the contempt petitioner. 2. Ms. Seema Sah, learned counsel for the respondent- contemnor. 3. In sequel to the order dated 12.02.2026 respondent- K.S. Farswan, Registrar, Uttarakhand Pharmacy Council, Directorate of Medical Services, is present before this Court, through video conferencing. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-contemnor, on the basis of instructions dated 11.06.2026, submitted that the order dated 12.02.2026, passed by this Court in WPMS No.328 of 2024, Pratibha Rawat Vs. Pharmacy Council, has now been complied with. 5. The office memo dated 11.06.2026 is taken on record and is made part of the record. 6. The said fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 7. Personal presence of respondent-K.S. Farswan, Registrar, is hereby exempted. 8. Accordingly contempt petition is hereby closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 16.06.2026 SK