Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6931 (UTT)

RAM KRISHNA SINGH TOMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/711/2026 · 2026-06-16

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.711 of 2026 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Ms. Suraiya Naaz, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the private respondent. 2. Learned State Counsel submits that the investigation has since culminated in the filing of the charge-sheet. Therefore, the relief sought in the present writ petition, namely, transfer of investigation, no longer survives for consideration and the petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to him in accordance with law. (Alok Mahra, J.) 16.06.2026 Arpan