Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 693 (BOM)

DATTATRAY VISHNU MORE AND ORS v. Nandkumar Narayan Avchat

IA/2158/2026 · 2026-06-17

Gauri Godse

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30-IA-2158-2026.docx rrpillai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2158 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL ST NO. 98023 OF 2020 Dattatray Vishnu More and Ors .....Applicants Vs. Nandkumar Narayan Avchat and Ors .....Respondents Mr. M. V. Rawool i/b. Mr. Avinash Avhad for the Applicants/Appellants. Ms. Sakshi Inamdar i/b. Mr. Siddhesh Pilankar for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 17th JUNE 2026 ORDER: 1. This application is for issuing fresh notice to respondent no. 1 on fresh address mentioned in the application. Learned counsel for the appellants shall amend the cause title of the civil application for condonation of delay and the second appeal to add the fresh address of respondent no. 1. Amendment to be carried out forthwith in court. 1/2 RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2026.06.18 14:30:45 +0530 30-IA-2158-2026.docx 2. If amendment is carried out, office shall issue notice to respondent no. 1 in the application for condonation of delay, returnable on 29th July 2026. 3. In addition to the court notice, learned advocate for the appellants to serve the respondents by private service and file service affidavit before the next date. 4. Learned advocate for the appellants to ensure that copies are supplied and court notice is served by taking hamdast. 5. Interim application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2