Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6928 (UTT)

DEEPAK GOYAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/226/2026 · 2026-06-16

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS ABA No. 226 of 2026 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, learned Additional Advocate General alongwith Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application at this stage and seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file fresh as and when the cause of action arises. (Alok Mahra J.) 16.06.2026 Ujjwal