Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 69260 (MAD)

R. MURALI AND 2 OTHERS v. SRI KANYAKA PARAMESWARI

A/787/2026 · 2026-02-26

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 787 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A No. 787 of 2026 in CS NO. 649 OF 2003 1. R. Murali, 15/3, Old No.8/3, Ponnambala Vathiyar St, Mylapore, Chennai 4 2. Rajeswari Prasad, Palanisamy Apts. New.No.193/E4, Luz Church Rd, Mylapore, Chennai-4 3. Vummidi Surendra, No.48, 3rd Main Rd. Vijay Nagar, Velacherry, Chennai-42 ..Applicant(s) Vs 1. Sri Kanyaka Parameswari Devasthanam and Charities, Rep.by its Committee Of Management, Comprising Of Defendents 2 to 7 2. Colla Venkata Chandrasekar Chetty, Dharmakartha. 3. M.Venkatesaperumal 4. B.Muthukrishnan 5. V.Srinivasan https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 787 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 6. P.Madhusudhan 7. Vummidi Srihari 8. D.V.S.Gupta 9. P.J.P.N.Gupta 10.Dr.Thavva Vedagiriswara Rao 11.Dr.G.V.Chalapathi 12.CA.P.Pattabiraman 13.Mannar Udayakumar 14.Voora Anjaneyalu (Defts.9to14 impleaded As Per Order.Dt.18/2/14 In A.No.5341/13) 15.Nalam Sree Kanth 16.Dr.G.Vijayakumar 17.P.V.Krishna Rao (defts.15 To 17 impleaded As Per Ord.Dt.10/04/2014 In A.No.2474/14). 18.Mr.Vootukuru Sarath Kumar, Chennai-1 19.Mr.Desi Lakshmi Narayana, Chennai-1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 787 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 20.Sri Guggilam Ramesh, (Defendants 18 o D20 impleaded as per Order Dated 07.12.2018 In A.No.9534/2018). ..Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.Rahul Balaji For Respondent(s): M/s.Rank Associates for RR1, 15, 16, 18 & 19 Mr.A.Venkatesh Kumar for D3 Mr.P.K.Sivasubramanyam for D11, 13, 14 & 17 Mr.S.L.Sudersanam, for D20 ORDER This application has been filed seeking to re-open the evidence of PW1 for the limited purpose of receiving and taking on record the Certificate affidavit under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 in respect of Exs.P24 & 25. 2.Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3.The learned counsel for the respondents/defendants reported no objection to allow this application. 4.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application and also considering the fact that re-opening the evidence is to mark https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 787 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 the Certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 in respect of the documents viz., Exs.P24 & 25 and in order to give fair chance to the applicants to examine the witness, this application is allowed. 5.Registry is directed to list the main suit on 05.03.2026, before the learned Master for continuation of plaintiffs’ side evidence. 26-02-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No DN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 787 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 P.DHANABAL J. DN A No. 787 of 2026 in CS NO. 649 OF 2003 26-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis