Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 69259 (MAD)

R.JAGANATHAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/5667/2026 · 2026-02-19

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 5667 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 5667 of 2026 1. R.Jaganathan S/o. Ramasamy Gounder, D. No.180., Panneerkuthipalayam, Pirithi Kumarapalayam, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector The District Collector Office, Namakkal District. 2.The District Revenue Officer The District Collector Office, Namakkal District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruchengode, Namakkal District. 4.The Tahsildar Tiruchengode, Namakkal District. 5.A. Krishnaveni, 6.M. Saraswathi Respondent(s) WP No. 5667 of 2026 PRAYER Directing the 2nd Respondent to dispose the review filed by the petitioner dated 26.05.2025 before the 2nd Respondent within the time frame fixed by this Honble Court https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 5667 of 2026 WP No. 5667 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.. A.Saravanan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For R1 to R4 ND/W-R4 and R6 -Pvt ORDER This writ petition has been filed, seeking for a limited relief. 2. The petitioner seeks for early disposal of the petitioner’s review petition dated 26.05.2025 pending on the file of the second respondent. 3. Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s review petition dated 26.05.2025 is directed to be disposed of by the second respondent within a time frame to be fixed by this Court by adhering to the principles of natural justice and after hearing the objections of the respondents 5 and 6 and any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire. 5. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 5 and 6, notice to the respondents 5 and 6 is dispensed with by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 5667 of 2026 6. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s review petition dated 26.05.2025. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to dispose of the review petition dated 26.05.2025 filed by the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by adhering to the principles of natural justice after hearing the objections of the respondents 5 and 6 and any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire. No Costs. 19-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Collector The District Collector Office, Namakkal District. 2.The District Revenue Officer The District Collector Office, Namakkal District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruchengode, Namakkal District. 4.The Tahsildar https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 5667 of 2026 Tiruchengode, Namakkal District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 5667 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 5667 of 2026 19-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis