[2026:RJ-JP:20402-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 515/2026 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.490/2025 1. Kumarr Singh Son Of Shripat, Resident Of Devri, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli, (Rajasthan) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bharatpur) 2. Lekhraj Son Of Rajendra, Resident Of Devri, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli, (Rajasthan) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bharatpur) 3. Hariom Son Of Kamar Singh, Resident Of Devri, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli, (Rajasthan) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bharatpur) 4. Jogendra Singh Son Of Shripat, Resident Of Devri, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli, (Rajasthan) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bharatpur) ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv., assisted by Mr. Amar Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun, for the complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 14/05/2026 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicants along with the appeal. [2026:RJ-JP:20402-DB] (2 of 3) [SOSA-515/2026] 2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused- applicants submits that the accused-applicants have been convicted for the offences under Sections 148, 307/149 & 302/149. 3. Learned Senior Counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the accused-applicants namely Kumarr Singh, Lekhraj & Hariom were on bail during trial and accused-applicant namely Jogendra Singh was not on bail during trial and presently, all the accused-applicants are serving their sentence in District Jail, Karauli. He further submits that the accused-applicants have been falsely implicated in this matter and according to the statement of the eye witnesses, allegation of causing fire arm injury is against co-accused persons namely Rajendra and Gajraj. He further submits that the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future and prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicants may be suspended and they be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 4. Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, and also considering the evidence of eye witnesses, according to which, the allegation of causing fire arm injury is against co- accused persons namely Rajendra and Gajraj and the fact that hearing of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper [2026:RJ-JP:20402-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-515/2026] to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application. 8. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicants shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicants be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 10.07.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Upendra Pratap Singh /12