Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6919 (JHR)

AMIT YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1892/2026 · 2026-04-22

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:11762] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1892 of 2026 1. Amit Yadav, aged about26years, son of Bhim Yadav, resident of Vill- Aaredana, P.O.-Loinga, P.S.-Patan, District-Palamau, Jharkhand. 2. Akash Yadav, aged about 27 years, son of Yugul Yadav, resident of Vill-Loinga, P.O.- Loinga, P.S.- Patan, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. 3. Shrawan Yadav, aged about 34 years, son of Sohrai Yadav, resident of Vill- Aredana, P.O.- Loinga, P.S.- Patan, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 22.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Patan P.S. Case No. 174 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 398 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 329(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of Prevention of Witch Practices Act, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are case and counter case and the allegations are made of entering into the house and making assault. He next submits that the allegations are also made of entering into the house of the informant with sharp cutting weapon, wherein the injury is said to be caused by hard and blunt substance. He also submits that the petitioners are having no [2026:JHHC:11762] -2- criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para- 11 of the petition. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of entering into the house of the informant and making assault. 5. Considering that there are case and counter case between the parties and in the FIR, it has been stated that the accused persons have entered into the house with sharp cutting weapon, wherein the alleged injury is said to be caused by hard and blunt substance and further the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-11 of the petition, in that view of the matter, the petitioners, named above, are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-22.04.2026 Amitesh/-