Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6916 (AP)

M.A.SALEEM v. STATE OF AP

CRLRC/110/2019 · 2026-07-29

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010027412019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 110/2019 Between: 1. M.A.SALEEM, , S/O.M.A.SALAM, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE EXTENSION OFFICER, AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, R/O.D.N0.14-5-130, ISLAMPET, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. BASHEERUNNISA,, W/O.M.A.SALAM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.14-5-LK ISLAMPET, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATHI. 2. FIRDOS, W/O.SALEEM, AGED ABOUT 34 R/O.BARAIMAMPUNJA, GUNTUR TOWN 3. SHAIK SHAMA, , W/O.SK.SATTAR,AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.14-5-13, ISLAMPET, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. SHAIK SATTAR, S/O.SK.ANWAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.14-5- 3, ISLAMPET, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. MUNEER, S/O.LATE M.A.SALAM, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-E-130, ISLAMPET, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.110 of 2019 Dated 30.07.2026 1. AHMED KHAN MOHAMMED Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Even on 08.07.2026, there was no representation for the Petitioners or Respondent Nos.2 to 5. Today also, there is no representation. The matter is posted under the caption "For Dismissal"; yet, there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. There is a delay of 212 days in filing the Criminal Revision Case challenging the judgment dated 21.03.2018 passed in Crl.A.No.138 of 2017 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-XII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Guntur, arising out of D.V.C.No.178 of 2012. Hence, I.A.No.1 of 2019 is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is also dismissed. 2. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date:30.07.2026 KMS 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.110 of 2019 Dated 30.07.2026 59 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 110/2019 Date: 30.07.2026 KMS