Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6913 (MAD)

D.Manoharan and 2 Others v. Radha Rani and 5 Others

A/1495/2026 · 2026-04-07

A D Maria Clete

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.04.2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE A.No.1495 of 2026 in A.No.5021 of 2025 in O.P.No.246 of 2024 1.D.Manoharan 2.M.Divya 3.M.Padmavathi ...Applicants/Applicants/Petitioners vs. 1.Radha Rani Satyakumari – (Since Deceased) 2.Kalavathy 3.Anitha @ Rajeswari 4.R.Balakrishnan ...Respondents -1 to 4/ Respondents -1 to 4 5.K.Sumathi Kamalakannan 6.B.Venkatakrishnan ...Respondents-5 to 6/ Respondents-5 to 6/ Proposed Respondents-6 to 7 Prayer: This application has been filed under Order-14, Rule-8 of O.S.Rules with Order-6 Rules-16&17 & Order-12, Rule-6 of C.P.C., praying to pass an order to amend the 6th respondent name in the Judges Summons in the above A.No.5021 of 2025 in O.P.No.246 of 2024. Page No.1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sivakumar For R2,R3&R5 : Mr.V.B.Thirupathi Kumar ********** O R D E R This application has been filed seeking to amend the 6th respondent’s name as detailed in the schedule for amendment in the Judges Summons in the above A.No.5021 of 2025 in O.P.No.246 of 2024 ie., as Venkatanarasimhan Balakrishnan instead of B.Venkatakrishnan. 2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 3. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application, this application stands ordered. 4. Registry is directed to carryout the aforesaid amendment in respect of the name of the 6th respondent in the cause list of the application. 07.04.2026 nvi Page No.2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J. nvi A.No.1495 of 2026 in A.No.5021 of 2025 in O.P.No.246 of 2024 07.04.2026 Page No.3 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis