Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010085602026 2026:GAU-AS:7391 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : MC/24/2026 MS BHAVYA ENTERPRISE A REGD. PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT HOUSE NO. 90, DR. B BARUAH ROAD, OPPOSITE HOTEL LANDMARK, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M), DIST., ASSAM REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR- SRI GOURAV AGARWAL. 2: SRI GOURAV AGARWAL S/O. LT. O.P. AGARWAL PROPRIETOR OF M/S. BHAVYA ENTERPRISE R/O. FLAT NO. 203 MAINAKUNJ APARTMENT SIKRIA COMPOUND CHRISTIANBASTI GUWAHATI P.S. DISPUR KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSA VERSUS STATE BANK OF INDIA REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, HEAD OFFICE, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M) DIST., ASSAM 2:THE CHIEF MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA S.M.E. BRANCH G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI KAMRUP METROPOLITAN DISTRICT ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE DISPUR POLICE STATION DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. ASHOK SARAF, MR. A. KAUSHIK,B SARMA,MR P K BORA,MR S J SAIKIA,MR. N N DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Linked Case : WP(C)/2322/2018 M/S BHAVYA ENTERPRISE AND ANR. A REGD. PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT HOUSE NO. 90 DR. B BARUAH ROAD OPPOSITE HOTEL LANDMARK ULUBARI GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR- SRI GOURAV AGARWAL. 2: SRI GOURAV AGARWAL S/O. LT. O.P. AGARWAL PROPRIETOR OF M/S. BHAVYA ENTERPRISE R/O. FLAT NO. 203 MAINAKUNJ APARTMENT SIKRIA COMPOUND CHRISTIANBASTI GUWAHATI P.S. DISPUR KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HEAD OFFICE Page No.# 3/4 DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM 2:THE CHIEF MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA S.M.E. BRANCH G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI KAMRUP METROPOLITAN DISTRICT ASSAM 3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE DISPUR POLICE STATION DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. H DAS Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 27.05.2026 Heard Mr. A. Kaushik, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. H. K. Hazarika, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. The connected writ petition i.e., WP(C)/2322/2018 was dismissed for non- prosecution. The instant Miscellaneous Case has been filed for restoration of the case. After perusing the reasons as explained in the instant Miscellaneous Case, this Court is convinced that the matter should be restored. Page No.# 4/4 Accordingly, the Miscellaneous Case is disposed of by restoring the connected writ petition. Let the matter be listed after 2(two) weeks. Registry to reflect the name of the learned Standing Counsel, SBI in the cause list. JUDGE Comparing Assistant