HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1086/2026 Vishnu Kumar S/o Sovran Singh, R/o Gurjar Pura Nimkheda, Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In Jail Badi, District Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishna Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 19/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-peti- tioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 282/2025 registered at Police Station Sarmathura, District Dholpur for the offences under Section(s) 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC and Section(s) 3, 4, 6, 7 & 10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures to Prevent Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2022. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is an innocent person, has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the alleged examination in question, i.e. Pre-Diploma in Elementary Education Entrance Examination, is not a public examination for recruitment. Learned counsel also submits this examination is conducted only for admission into college, however, the petitioner did not even take admission in the college pursuant to the said examination; therefore, neither any wrongful gain has been caused to the petitioner nor any wrongful loss has been caused to any other person. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1086/2026] 3. Learned counsel further contends that the case is triable by Magistrate; the petitioner has no criminal antecedent; he is in custody since 28.12.2025 and no recovery is required to be made from him. He further submits that the investigation has been completed, the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial of the case will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him in further custody, therefore, prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts that the offence is triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed in the matter and trial of the case will take considerably long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Vishnu Kumar S/o Sovran Singh, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/11