Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 2600 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 2600 of 2026 Selvam ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Bommidi Police Station, Dharmapuri District. (Crime No.6 of 2026). ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event on their arrest by the Respondent police in Crime No.6 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Pradeep For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(A) of TNP Act, in Crime No.6 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 08.01.2026, the petitioner was found to be in illegal possession of kingfisher Beer (650 ml) – 94 bottles, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 2600 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Officer’s Choice Brandy (180 ml) – 100 bottles and Men’s Club Brandy – 35 bottles, totalling 289 bottles, allegedly valued at Rs.45,230/- and on seeing the police, he ran away from the scene of occurrence and the said contraband was seized by the respondent police. Hence the case has been registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and he is ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution's case and upon instructions submitted that the petitioner is having sixty one previous cases of similar in nature. Hence, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; and taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner; and also the fact that sixty one previous cases of similar in nature has been registered against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 2600 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6.
Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 05-02-2026 GBI To 1.State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Bommidi Police Station, Dharmapuri District. (Crime No.6 of 2026). 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 2600 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 K.RAJASEKAR, J. GBI CRL OP No. 2600 of 2026 05-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis