Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6909 (CAL)

KURBAN MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/511/2026 · 2026-04-08

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.04.2026 Serial no. 297 [G.S.D] CRM (NDPS) 511 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Patiram Police Station Case No. 63 of 2025 dated 18.03.2025 u/s 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27A of the NDPS Act, 1985. -And- In the matter of : Kurban Mondal … Petitioner(s) Mr. Koushik Choudhury Mr. Dwaipayan Panda … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Anand Keshari Ms. Debadrita Mondal … for the NCB Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that after the order dated 20th January, 2026 in CRM (NDPS) 66 of 2026 was passed, there has been no progress in the case. The earlier order also directed the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of the seizure list witnesses is over. Having considered the present state of affairs and the engagement of judicial officers in administrative work, I am of the opinion that, some space must be given to the prosecution to complete its case, as such, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. 2 However, as charges have already been framed, the learned trial court would give priority for examination of the seizure list witnesses. The petitioner would approach this court after the seizure list witnesses are examined preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed before the learned trial court. Accordingly, CRM(NDPS) 511 of 2026 is dismissed. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)