LOKESH KUMAR SON OF SHRI SURTA RAM v. MR. RAJWINDER SINGH BHATTI
CCP/1088/2024 · 2026-03-06
Anand Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6905 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6905 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9751] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1088/2024 Lokesh Kumar Son Of Shri Surta Ram, Aged About 32 Years, (Ct/ dvr No. 150706063) Resident Of Village Fatehabad, Ps- Kotkasim, District- Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Mr. Rajwinder Singh Bhatti, Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, Block-13, Cgos Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003
2. Mr. Shrikant Kishore, Dy. Inspector General Of Police (Southern Sector-1) Hq, Central Industrial Security Force, Chennai
3. Sh. Akhilesh Kumar, The Commandant, 4Th Reserve Bn., Central
Industrial
Security
Force,
Sivagangai, Amaravathipudur, Tamil Nadu
4. The Union Of India, Through Its Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, Block-13, Cgos Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mananjay Singh Rathore for Mr. M.S. Raghav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak Mr. Arnav Singh Mr. Utkarsh Meena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 06/03/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the respondents, at the outset, submits that compliance of order dated 24th May, 2024 has already been made.
2. This fact has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
[2026:RJ-JP:9751] (2 of 2) [CCP-1088/2024]
3. In view of above, this contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. Notices stand discharged.
5. Mere dismissal of this contempt petition would not preclude the petitioner from seeking redressal of his grievance by way of pursuing other legal remedies available under law.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/100