[2026:RJ-JP:15557] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3058/2023 Vishnu Sharma Son Of Shri Shriniwas, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village Sekhapur Brahman, Tehsil Rajakheda, District Dholpur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Director General Of Police, Jaipur (Raj). 3. Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur, District Dholpur (Raj). 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Komal Shekhawat on behalf of Mr. Govind Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 15/04/2026 1. The instant misc. petition is listed before this Court in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Vijay Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 773/2026, decided on 15.01.2026), wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court observed that in various matters, interim orders have been passed in criminal revision petitions and petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as a result of which trial relating to serious offences such as murder, rape, dacoity, dowry death, etc., could not proceed and remained stalled/held up due to the passage of considerable time. [2026:RJ-JP:15557] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3058/2023] 2. Directions have been issued to this Court and other High Courts to take up such like matters which are pending since long, on priority and decide the same expeditiously without deferring the hearings to subsequent dates. 3. The instant petition has been submitted for seeking directions to the Investigating Officer for conducting fair and impartial investigation of FIR No. 43/2023 registered with Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 302 & 506 IPC. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as the counsel for the petitioner apprised this Court that during pendency of this petition, charge-sheet has been submitted against the accused persons and charges have been framed against them, hence, the instant petition has become infructuous. 5. Considering the above, the instant petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, shall also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam-Puneet/21