IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.3011 of 2026 Decided on: 16.03.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neeraj Singh …..Petitioner Versus The State of H.P. & Ors .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. R.L.Chaudhary, Advocate alongwith Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaula and Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocates General for respondents No. 1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge This writ petition has been filed for grant of following substantive reliefs: - “(i) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondent State to comply with the judgment dated 27.03.2018 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 231 of 2010, titled as Shakti Vahini V/s Union of India and others within a time bound manner. ii) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondent No. 1 to 3 to consider the complaint of the petitioner in terms of the direction 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 issued by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 231 of 2010, titled as Shakti Vahini V/s Union of India and others, decided on 27.03.2018.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that for the redressal of grievances raised in this writ petition, petitioner has preferred a complaint to respondents No. 1 to 3. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner would be content in case respondent No.2/competent authority is directed to look into the complaint and take appropriate action in accordance with law. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/competent authority to look into the complaint of the petitioner, examine the same and take appropriate action as deemed fit, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua March 16, 2026 Judge R.Atal