Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 69000 (MAD)

R.PERIYASAMY v. The District Collector

WP/4068/2026 · 2026-02-12

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 4068 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 4068 of 2026 1. R.Periyasamy Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Namakkal District, Namakkal 2.The District Revenue Officer Namakkal District, Namakkal 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Namakkal Division, Namakkal District. 4.The Tahsildar Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District. 5.The Revenue Inspector Nallipalayam Firka, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District. 6.The Village Administrative Officer Mitta Aniyar Village, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District. 7.P.Venkatesh Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 2nd respondent to dispose the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 15.10.2025 on merits within the time limit fixed by this Honourable Court For Petitioner(s): M/s.K.Karthikeyan A.Praveen For Respondent: Mr. D.Ravichander, Special Government Pleader https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4068 of 2026 for R1 to R6 R7 – N D/w ORDER This writ petition has been filed, seeking for a limited relief. 2. The petitioner seeks for early disposal of the petitioner’s appeal dated 15.10.2025 pending on the file of the second respondent. 3. Mr. D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 6. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s appeal dated 15.10.2025 is directed to be disposed of by the second respondent within a time frame to be fixed by this Court by adhering to the principles of natural justice and after hearing the objections of the seventh respondent and any other third party whom the second respondent deems fit to enquire. 5. Since no adverse orders are passed against the seventh respondent, notice to the seventh respondent is dispensed with by this Court. 6. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s appeal dated 15.10.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4068 of 2026 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to dispose of the appeal dated 15.10.2025 filed by the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by adhering to the principles of natural justice after hearing the objections of the seventh respondent as well as any other third party whom the second respondent deems fit to enquire. No Costs. 12-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Collector Namakkal District, Namakkal 2.The District Revenue Officer Namakkal District, Namakkal 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Namakkal Division, Namakkal District. 4.The Tahsildar Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District. 5.The Revenue Inspector Nallipalayam Firka, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District. 6.The Village Administrative Officer Mitta Aniyar Village, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4068 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 4068 of 2026 12-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis