Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6900 (KAR)

SMT SUREKHA A v. CHIEF REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS,

WP/3470/2026 · 2026-03-10

M I Arun

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14559 WP No. 3470 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.3470 OF 2026 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUREKHA A AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O. UMESH H.N. RESIDING AT NO.03, 6TH CROSS, BALAJI LAYOUT, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU-560 092. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRUTHVEEN PRALHAD KATTIMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHIEF REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003. 2. MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, MALLESHWARAM DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 003. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14559 WP No. 3470 of 2026 3. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (STATICS), WEST ZONE, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BENGALURU-560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S. KARTHIKEYAN, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE-D ENDORSEMENT DATED 15.11.2025 BEARING NO.SA.NI(SAM)PA/JA/MA/PR/148/25-26 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 REJECTING SEEKING OF CORRECTION OF NAME OF THE MOTHER IN ANNEXURE-A BIRTH CERTIFICATE REGISTRATION DATED 06.01.2025, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14559 WP No. 3470 of 2026 ORAL ORDER 1. The writ petition is filed with a prayer to change the name of the mother in the birth certificate of the child, Master Nutan U. The name of the mother is mentioned as Smt.Rekha A. It is contended by the petitioner that Master Nutan U. is her child and her correct name is Smt.Surekha A. and not Smt.Rekha A. Hence, she made representation to the respondents. However, respondent No.3 has issued an endorsement (Annexure-'D' to the writ petition). The same reads as under:- "§ÈºÀvï ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ªÀĺÁ£ÀUÀgÀ ¥Á°PÉ ¸ÀASÉå:¸À.¤.(¸ÁA)¥À/d/ªÀ/¦Dgï/148/25-26 ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ (¸ÁATåPÀ)gÀªÀgÀ PÀbÉÃj, ¨sÁµÀåA ¥ÁPÀð, ¸ÀA¦UÉgÀ¸ÉÛ, ªÀįÉèñÀégÀA, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:15/11/2025. »A§gÀºÀ «µÀAiÀÄ: d£À£À ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæ ¤ÃqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ G¯ÉèÃR:- ¤ªÀÄä Cfð ¢£ÁAPÀ:-30/09/2025 ******* ªÉÄîÌAqÀ «µÀAiÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ G¯ÉèÃRPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ, vÀªÀÄä CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯ÁVzÀÄÝ, d£À£À ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è vÁ¬ÄAiÀÄ ºÉ¸ÀgÀ£ÀÄß SMT. REKHA A JA§ÄzÀgÀ §zÀ¯ÁV SMT. SUREKHA A JAzÀÄ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä PÉÆÃjgÀÄwÛÃj. ¸ÀzÀj «µÀAiÀÄPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ 1969 gÀ - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14559 WP No. 3470 of 2026 d£À£À/ªÀÄgÀt PÁAiÉÄÝ, 15 gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ d£À£À ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ªÀÄUÀÄ«£À vÁ¬ÄAiÀÄ ºÉ¸Àj£À ªÀÄÆ® ¸ÀégÀÆ¥À §zÀ°AiÀiÁUÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«gÀĪÀÅ¢®èªÉAzÀÄ w½¹zÉ." Sd/- ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ (¸ÁATåPÀ) §ÈºÀvï ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ªÀĺÁ£ÀUÀgÀ ¥Á°PÉ UÉ, SMT.SUREKHA W/O UMESH H N NO.03, 6TH CROSS, BALAJI LAYOUT, BENGALURU NORTH , BANGALORE - 560092" 2. Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, reads as under:- "15. Correction or cancellation of entry in the register of births and deaths.—If it is proved to the satisfaction of the Registrar that any entry of a birth or death in any register kept by him under this Act is erroneous in form or substance, or has been fraudulently or improperly made, he may, subject to such rules as may be made by the State Government with respect to the conditions on which and the circumstances in which such entries may be corrected or cancelled, correct the error or cancel the entry by suitable entry in the margin, without any alteration of the original entry, and shall sign the marginal entry and add thereto the date of the correction or cancellation." - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14559 WP No. 3470 of 2026 3. Thus, respondent No.1 in this case is required to make an enquiry and if he comes to the conclusion based on the documents submitted by the petitioner, that the petitioner is indeed the mother of the child Master Nutan U., and her name is Smt.Surekha A., then in that instance, he is required to correct the name. Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 empowers him to do so. The request cannot be rejected on the ground that the name Smt.Rekha A., as found in the birth register is substantially different from Smt.Surekha A. The purpose of Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 is to correct the errors in the birth certificate of any person, and the power to do so is vested with respondent No.1. 4. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is disposed of. The impugned endorsement dated 15.11.2025 issued by respondent No.1 at Annexure-'D' is set aside. 5. Respondent No.1 is directed to make the necessary enquiry and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The same shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14559 WP No. 3470 of 2026 6. In view of disposal of the main petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any stand disposed of. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52