Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 690 (RAJ)

SUMIT S/O CHOTELAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1932/2026 · 2026-03-18

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11429] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1932/2026 Sumit S/o Chotelal, R/o Bhodhan, Thana Singhana, Dist. Jhunjhunu, (Raj.). (Accused At Presently Confined In Khetri). ----Applicant/ Accused Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Its P.P, Khetri Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Makhan Lal Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 18/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant- accused under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 333/2025 registered at Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Section(s) 109(1) of BNS and under Sections 3/25, 5/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant-accused submits that the applicant-accused has been falsely implicated in this case and the applicant-accused is behind the bars since December, 2025. He further submits that the charge-sheet against the applicant- accused has already been filed. Conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody and therefore, prays that the applicant-accused may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. [2026:RJ-JP:11429] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1932/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the applicant-accused. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties that the applicant-accused is behind the bars since December, 2025 and the charge-sheet against the applicant-accused has already been filed. The alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Trial will take its own time. Without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the applicant-accused on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the applicant-accused Sumit S/o Chotelal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the applicant-accused shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the applicant-accused for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. [2026:RJ-JP:11429] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1932/2026] 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /34