Serial No.124 Supplementary Cause List-I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 99/2026 IN WP(C) 2797/2025 FAYAZ AHMAD MALIK. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mohammad Saleem Mir, Advocate. Vs. AJAZ AHMAD ZARGAR AND ANOTHER. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh Dy. AG. CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge. ORDER 17.04.2026 01. The instant contempt petition arises out of an order/ judgment dated 14th November, 2025 by virtue of which the writ petition bearing WP(C) 2797/2025 was disposed of by directing the respondents to accord consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner 15th September, 2025, strictly as per law and the rules occupying the field, within a period of four weeks, from the date receipt of the said order. 02. Issue notice to the respondents. 03. Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 04. Since the direction was only to the extent of according consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner 15th September, 2025, no fruitful purpose would be achieved to keep this contempt petition pending, as Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General who has accepted notice on behalf of respondents submits that the order out of which the instant contempt petition arises, will be implemented within a period of two weeks. 05. In the aforesaid backdrop, the instant contempt petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to comply the order dated 14th November, 2025 within a period of two weeks from today and the order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondents, be forwarded to the petitioner through registered posts. 06. It is made clear that in case the order supra is not complied with, within the time so granted, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of the instant contempt petition and in that eventuality, this Court will be constrained to have recourse to coercive measures against the respondents. 07. Contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge SRINAGAR: 17.04.2026 “HAMID” Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 17.04.2026