Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 69 (HP)

SANDEEP KUMAR v. M/S BALWANT SINGH AND COMPANY

CRMPM/271/2026 · 2026-03-05

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SANDEEP KUMAR Versus M/S BALWANT SINGH AND COMPANY CRMPM-271 of 2026 05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Servedaman Rathore, Advocate, for the applicant/ petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the non-applicant/respondent. CRMPM-271 of 2026 By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicants/petitioners for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying criminal revision petition, which is barred by limitation. Having carefully perused the averments contained in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, this Court finds no impediment in accepting the prayer, especially when delay caused in maintaining accompanying criminal revision petition does not appear to be intentional or willful, rather same has occurred on account of circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant, as such, the same deserves to be condoned. In view of above, delay, which has been otherwise sufficiently explained is condoned. The application is disposed of. Cr. Revision No. _______ of 2026 (CR.RST-1098/26/23/2/ 26) Be registered. Admit. Notice to respondents be issued, returnable for 09.04.2026, on taking steps within one week. Cr.MP No. of 2023 (CRMPST No. 1100/26) Notice in aforesaid terms. Reply, if any, be filed on or before next date of hearing. In the meantime, substantive sentence imposed by the learned court below shall remain suspended, subject to applicant’s depositing 50% of compensation amount, which shall also include amount, if any, already deposited and furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court within a period of four weeks, with condition that the applicant shall appear in the court as and when directed and shall surrender to serve out the sentence imposed, in case the revision is ultimately dismissed. March 05, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge