2026:JHHC:11563-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No.88 of 2026 ----- 1. Srikant Tiwary, aged about 65 years, Son of Late Kedarnath Tiwari, resident of Smariddhi Enclave, Flat No. A/3, 3rd Floor, Near Junior DAV School, P.O.- Ranchi University, P.S.-Gonda, Kanke Road, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 2. Deo Kumar Singh, aged about 63 years, Son of Late Rambilash Singh, resident of Gandhinagar, Qrs. No. 1/A 46, Near Private House, Kanke Road, Ranchi, P.O.-Ranchi University, P.S.-Gonda, Kanke Road, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 3. Shiv Prasad Ram, aged about 61 years, Son of Late Bilash Ram, resident of Village-Bukru, Bukru Chowk, Opposite Blue Bird Restaurant, P.O.-Bukru, P.S.-Kanke, Ranchi (Jharkhand). 4. Sudhir Ram, aged 60 years, S/o Late Bigu Nayek, R/o Silwai, Ranchi, P.O. and P.S.- Tatisilway, District Ranchi, Pin Code- 835103 .......... Appellants. -Versus- 1. Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Limited, A subsidiary of Coal India Limited/Government of India, Public Sector Undertaking, through its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director having its registered office at Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, P.O.- Ranchi University, P.S.-Gonda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Manager, Department of Personnel/Administration, CMPDI, having its registered office at Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, P.O.- Ranchi University, P.S.-Gonda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Deputy Registration Officer, Social Economic and National Census 2011, Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi, P.O.-G.P.O, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Ranchi. .......... Respondents. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Appellants : Mr. Niladri Shekhar Mukharjee, Advocate : Ms. Sandhya Singh, Advocate For the CMPDI : Mr. Rajesh Lala, Advocate ----- Order No.02 Date: 21.04.2026 1. Learned counsel for the appellants, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty to explore the alternate remedies for recovery of alleged dues towards over time work. 2026:JHHC:11563-DB 2 2. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in the above terms. However, it is clarified that all contentions of all parties on all issues are kept open. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 21st April, 2026 Rohit/Rashmi Uploaded on 22.04.2026