Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6896 (UTT)

ROSHAN SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/726/2026 · 2026-06-15

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4803 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/726/2026 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Manju Bahuguna along with Mr. D.N. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Shailendra Singh Chauhan, learned Deputy A.G. along with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel, on the basis of written instructions received from the Investigating Officer, submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the investigation has been concluded and a charge-sheet has already been submitted before the competent court against the petitioner. 4. In view of the aforesaid development, present criminal writ petition has become infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed as such. 5. The written instructions produced by the learned State Counsel are taken on record. The Registry is directed to paginate the same as per record. (Alok Mahra, J.) 15.06.2026 Mamta MAM TA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f 244f3e584af1449e430ef900 bf09a6d67ebbd642671329b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1 d9cabfd54852c9e68911ca8b 66dd26690a191648ab5d8dd 004ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.06.16 18:35:18 +05'30'