p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 2927 of 2026 Anjana Tirkey …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Ray, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 23.04.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No. 2095 of 2025 pending on the file of learned SDJM, Panposh, Rourkela, arising out of Cyber P.S. Rourkela Case No.17 of 2025, for commission of offences punishable under Section 318(4)/ 319(2)/ 61(2)/ 336(3)/ 338/ 340(2)/ 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 read with Section- 66(D) of the I.T. Act. 3. This is the second journey of the Petitioner to this Court. Earlier the anticipatory bail application of the Petitioner was disposed of as withdrawn. 4. The allegation against the Petitioner is of facilitating for opening of fraudulent account. p. 2 5. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the co-accused who was taken into custody has been released on bail and charge sheet has already been filed on 30.10.2025. Hence, the Petitioner may be enlarged on pre-arrest bail. 6. On perusal of the charge sheet it is seen that the Petitioner is cited as accused No.XV. 7. Considering the nature of allegations and the ramifications, this Court is not inclined to entertain this application for pre-arrest bail. However, in the event the Petitioner surrenders before the learned Court in seisin in the aforesaid case and moves an application for his release on bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit. 8. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Ayesha