Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6887 (ORI)

BINOD BIHARI SAHOO v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/12320/2026 · 2026-04-23

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.12320 of 2026 Binod Bihari Sahoo ..... Petitioner Represented By Adv. – Mr. Sushanta Kumar Mishra -versus- State of Odisha and others ..... Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – Mr. S.K. Parhi, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 23.04.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. Perused the writ petition as well as the prayer made therein. 3. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayers:- “It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to: i) Admit the writ application; ii) Call for the records; iii) Direct the opposite parties to release the arrear salary for the intervening period from 22.07.2013 to 27.07.2013, 31.07.2013 to 02.08.2013, 05.08.2013 to 19.08.2013, 24.08.2013 to 27.08.2013, 04.09.2013 to 06.09.2013, 11.09.2013 to 30.09.2013, 03.12.2013 to 04.12.2013, 09.12.2013 to 19.12.2013 as regularize the leave period and regularize the service of petitioner Page 2 of 2. with effect from 11.11.2017 after compilation of six years of service pursuant to the appointment made by the opposite parties on dtd. 09.11.2011 and the petitioner join in the school on dtd. l1.11.2011 taking in to letter under Annexure-1 within a stipulated period. And further be pleased to pass any other order(s) / direction(s) as would be deemed just and proper in the interest of justice.” 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner and keeping in view the limited nature of grievance, this Court disposes of the writ petition permitting the Petitioner to make a fresh representation taking therein all the grounds along with the supporting documents before the Opposite Party No.3-District Education Officer, Nayagarh within three weeks from today. In such eventuality the Opposite Party No.3 shall do well to consider the grievance of the Petitioner in accordance with law and dispose of such representation by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of eight weeks from the date of the Petitioner approaches the Opposite Party No.3. The final decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.3 on such representation be communicated to the Petitioner within a week thereafter. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra ) Judge Debasis