Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6886 (UTT)

PRAMOD SHARMA v. NITIN SINGH BHADAURIA

CLCON/334/2026 · 2026-06-15

Pankaj Purohit

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CLCON No.334 of 2026 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Himanshu Pal, learned counsel for the contempt petitioner. 2. Mr. Siddharth Jain, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3. 3. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging willful and deliberate contempt of order of Division Bench dated 05.07.2024, passed in SPA No.203 of 2024, Pramod Sharma and others Vs. Punjab National Bank through its Chairman and ors, whereby the respondent-Bank was directed to maintain status quo with regard to the auction conducted by them. 4. It is admitted to the learned counsel for the parties that the property has already been auctioned, but the direction of this Court was not to proceed further in the matter and to maintain status quo, qua auctioned property of the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for the Bank-respondent nos.2 and 3 submitted that the Bank is not taking any further action regarding residential house of the petitioner, while they are only proceeding under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to get the physical possession of petitioner’s property. 6. If the possession is sought by the Bank then the petitioner has to get out of his residential house. 7. Since the order dated 05.07.2024 is of status quo with regard to the auction, the respondent-Bank has not 2 violated that as yet, therefore, no contempt is made out. The petitioner may get the order clarified by the Division Bench by making an appropriate application. 8. Accordingly contempt petition is hereby dismissed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 15.06.2026 SK