Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 68834 (MAD)

Mr. N. Senthil Kumar and 2 others v. Mr. N. Senthil Kumar

A/981/2026 · 2026-02-27

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 981 of 2026 in CS Sr.No.15886 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A No. 981 of 2026 IN CS DR NO. 15886 OF 2026 1. Mr. N. Senthil Kumar and 2 others S/o.Mr.Nalliah, No.895, Syndicate Bank, Colony, Anna Nagar, West, Extension, Chennai 600 101. and 2 Others 2. Mrs.N.Padmavathi W/o.Mr.K.Nalliah 3. Mrs.S.Karthika W/o.Mr.N.Senthil Kumar Applicant(s) Vs 1. Mr. N. Senthil Kumar S/o.Mr.Krishnasamy, Room NO.301, Ganga Residency, PC 1/1, Collector Nagar, Mogappair East, Chennai 600 037 and also residing at No.895, Syndicate Bank, Colony, Anna Nagar West, Extension, Chennai 600 101. Respondent(s) CS SR No. 15886 of 2026 1. Mr. N. Senthil Kumar Plaintiff(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 981 of 2026 in CS Sr.No.15886 of 2026 Vs 1. Mr. K. Nalliah Defendant(s) A No. 981 of 2026 For Applicant(s): M/S.J. Nandagopal J.Jyothi M.Vigneswar Ashok Lawrence B For Respondent: ORDER This application has been filed by the applicants/plaintiffs seeking to grant leave to sue against the respondent / defendant in respect of Item Nos.2 to 18 of the schedule properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court. 2. According to the applicants, they are the plaintiffs in the main suit and filed the suit for the relief of partition and separate possession. The Item No.1 of the schedule property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court and Item Nos.2 to 18 of the schedule properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court and a substantial part of the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court and the suit can be instituted before this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 981 of 2026 in CS Sr.No.15886 of 2026 3. This Court heard petitioner side and perused the records. 4. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit that the Item No.1 of the schedule property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court and Item Nos.2 to 18 of the schedule properties are situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court and the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to allow this application and therefore, leave is granted as prayed for. 5. The Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. 27-02-2026 mtl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 981 of 2026 in CS Sr.No.15886 of 2026 P. DHANABAL, J., mtl A No. 981 of 2026 IN CS DR NO. 15886 OF 2026 27.02.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis