HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 25474 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Sri Rahul Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for applicants, Sri Tanmay Sadh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for State. 2. Present application has been preferred with prayer to quash order dated 2.6.2026 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur in Misc. Case no. 95 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime no. 221 of 2025 (State vs. Anil Kumar and others) under sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) BNS, Police Station- Babugarh, District Hapur whereby learned court concerned directed to transfer disputed amount in question from the account of applicants to the account of respondent no. 2. 3. The prayer as made through instant application is misconceived. The proper adjudication of the prayer which has been raised through instant application is need not to be interfered since cause of action, if arises in favour of the applicants for seeking similar prayer lies before learned trial court itself where the matter is pending in shape of Case Crime no. 221 of 2025, since the cause as shown for seeking prayer as made through instant application is related to ethical behaviour which has been warranted from the opposite party no. 2 so that Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anju Shukla, Rahul Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Tanmay Sadh, G.A., Imran Syed Akanksha Chaudhary And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) he may not commit any crime in future. No adjudication before this Court is maintainable at the behest of apprehension and presumptions or any threat to commit certain further crime in future. 4. The instant application u/s 528 BNSS stands dismissed. September 9, 2026 Shaswat NA528 No. 25474 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad