2026:JHHC:11234 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 799 of 2025 1. Vijay Singh, aged about 73 years, S/o late Ram Dahin Singh, R/o Vasant Vihar, College Road, P.O. Korrah & P.S. Sadar, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. 2. Dr Khalid Eqbal, aged about 66 years, S/o late Jamil Ahmad Siddiqui, R/o Aliya Manzil House No. 424, Alflah Colony Road No. 4, Near Fahima Academy, Pugmill, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 3. Nawal Kishore Mehta, aged about 57 years, S/o D. Mehta, R/o House No.224 C, Housing Colony Road, Near VC Residence Sarley, P.O. & P.S. Barkagaon, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 4. Veena Kumari, aged about 51 years, W/o late Sitaram Sahu, R/o 13E, Bundel Nagar, Sarley Dipugaraha, Near NH 33, P.O. & P.S. – Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Ramniwas Yadav, father's name not known to Petitioners, the Director, Higher Education, Department of Higher, Technical Education & Skill Development, Government of Jharkhand, Office at 3rd Floor, Yojana Bhawan, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) 834002 3. Dr. Sadique Razaque, father's name not known to Petitioners, the Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribag, Office at Vinoba Bhave Road, Sindoor, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribag, District Hazaribag (Jharkhand) 825301. … … Opposite Parties --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : None For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Amaresh Kumar, Advocate : Ms. Riya Raj, Advocate For the State : Mr. Aman Shekhar, AC to GA I --- 14/17.04.2026 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. 2. This petition has been filed against the opposite party nos.2 & 3 for their alleged willful and deliberate violation of order dated 19.04.2024 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6174 of 2023. 3. The learned counsel for the opposite party no.3 has submitted that a supplementary show cause has been filed and admissible amount has been remitted to the petitioner. 2026:JHHC:11234 2 4. Considering the submission, this Court is not inclined to proceed any further in this contempt proceedings, which is hereby dropped. 5. If the petitioners have any surviving grievance, they may take steps as may be permissible under law. 6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is dismissed as not pressed. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated 17.04.2026: Uploaded on 21.04.2026 Saurav