2026:HHC:7237 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2256 of 2026 Decided on: 16.03.2026 Gulshan Kumar … Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd. & another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Ms. Oshin Anand, Advocate, vice Mr. Prantap Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representation with regard to the issue raised in the petition, but the same has not been decided by the Authority concerned till date. 2 This petition, accordingly, as prayed for, is disposed of with the direction that let representation of the petitioner be decided, in the light of the averments made therein as well as the judgment being relied upon by the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks by the Competent Authority. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any view on the merits of the case and the representation shall be decided by the Authority independently without being influenced by any observation made by this Court in this regard. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 16, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?