( 2026:JHHC:11130 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2951 of 2026 ------ Gurpreet Singh @ Sagar, aged about 30 years, son of Hardev Singh, resident of Namda Basti, H. No. 15, Line No. 4, A Block, P.O & P.S- Golmuri, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, APP ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 436 of 2025 arising out of Golmuri P.S. Case No. 108 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1332 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1) of the BNS, 2023 but charge has been framed under section 103 (1)/238 BNS. It is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the murder of his wife namely Manisha Kaur. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and there is no eye witness of the occurrence, and only because the petitioner was found absent from his house, he has been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that during the trial two witnesses have been examined but neither of them have supported the case of the prosecution and were declared hostile and even though the prosecution put leading questions to them, still they did not support the case of the prosecution. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.08.2025 as has been mentioned in para 18 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.16 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I Jamshedpur, with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 17.04.2026-Abha/