AMIT KUMAR SONI @ AMIT SONI ALLIAS AMIT KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3290/2026 · 2026-04-21
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6868 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6868 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:11605] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3290 of 2026
------ Amit Kumar Soni @ Amit Soni @ Amit Kumar, Aged 31, S/O- Vijay Soni, R/o- Sundar Path, Kumhaar Toli, Near Kailash Mandir, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Sukhdeonagar, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate
Mr. Bhanu Kumar No.1, Advocate
Ms. Kaushiki Mishra, Advocate
Mr. Dilip Kr. Saw, Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-21-04-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 647 of 2025 (N) corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No. 22 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(b), 22, 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act and 111(2)(b) of the B.N.S, 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of brown sugar and 20.58 gm of brown sugar was recovered from the petitioner and on the basis of the statement of the petitioner, 12.6 gm of brown sugar was recovered from Anisha Kumari. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.12.2025 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Commissioner-cum- Special Judge, N.D.P.S., Ranchi in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 647 of 2025 (N) corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No. 22 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 21.04.2026 Saroj/