Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6868 (CHH)

DHANANJAY DHAR SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6090/2022 · 2026-04-22

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:18630 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6090 of 2022 * - Dhananjay Dhar Sharma S/o Late Shri Dev Dhar Sharma, Aged About 61 Years Posted As Peon In Government Middle School Bengo, Block- Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar,, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal And Schedule Caste Development Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector (Education Branch), District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 5 - Shambu Prasad Yadav, Posted As Assistant Grade III, High School Jorahi, Block Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 6 - Gopal Ram Vare, Posted As Assistant Grade III, Higher School Barwahi, Block Ramchandrapur, District Balrapur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Manoj Kumar Sinha, Posted As Assistant Grade III, High School Kundikala, Block Rajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 8 - Abhijeet Mishra, Posted As Assistant Grade III, High School Jorahi, Block Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 9 - Karesh Ram, Posted As Assistant Grade III, High School Barwahi, Block Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 10 - Lalit Patel, Posted As Assistant Grade III, High School Bastikala, Block Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 11 - Arvind Kumar Singh, Posted As Assistant Grade III, High School Barwahi, Block Rachandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Prateek Singh Thakur, Advocate For For Respondents No. 1 to 4/ State : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.23 16:53:43 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 23/04/2026 1. Mr. Prateek Singh Thalur, Advocate would confine his submission pertaining to relief clause 10.2 of the writ petition, which reads as under :- “10.2 That, respondents be directed to consider the name of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Grade III considering his seniority in the gradation list issued on 01.04.2016 with all consequential benefits.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that initially the petitioner was appointed as waterman in the year 1991 under the respondent No. 4. He would further submit that thereafter, the petitioner was appointed to the permanent post of peon, but till date his name has not been considered for promotion to the post of Assistant Grade III (A.G. III). He would also submit that juniors to the petitioners have already been promoted to the post of A.G. III, therefore, a direction may be issued to respondent authorities to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion, strictly in accordance with the law within stipulated time. 3. On the other hand, Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer appearing for the State would oppose. He would submit that the claim of the petitioner was considered by the department and as he was lacking merit, therefore, he was not found suitable for promotion to the post of A.G. III. He would further submit that time bound pay scale has already 3 been granted to the petitioner. He would contend that the instant petition deserves to be dismissed. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 5. Considering the submission made by the respective Advocates, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to make a representation before respondent No. 4 within a period of 30 days, and in turn, the said authority is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of promotion to the post of A.G. III, strictly in accordance with the law, preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observation(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti