[2026:RJ-JP:12670] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1069/2024 Manna Lal Choudhary Son of Shri Narayan Lal Choudhary, Aged About 49 Years, Resident of 10, Ashok Vihar, Manyawas, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Varun Jain Son of Hansraj Jain, Resident of 60/162, Rajat Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur. 3. Roopa Jain Wife of Hansraj Jain, Resident of 60/162, Rajat Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur. 4. Hansraj Jain Son of Not Known, Resident of 60/162, Rajat Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur. 5. Mahaveer Singh Yadav, Station House Officer, Police Station Mansarovar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prahalad Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Veerendra Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 23/03/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 of Cr.PC, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.144/2024 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 379, 427 & 447 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition, parties have entered into compromise. Counsel submits that due to compromise, further proceedings in [2026:RJ-JP:12670] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1069/2024] the impugned FIR are fruitless and continuation thereof would be a futile exercise and a waste of precious judicial time and resources. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 4. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604 and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.144/2024 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) along with subsequent proceedings, is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /179