Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6865 (PNJ)

MOHAN SINGH AND ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/13935/2026 · 2026-05-06

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 125 CWP-13935-2026 Date of Decision: 06.05.2026 MOHAN SINGH AND ANR. ...Petitioners Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate and Ms. Muskan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G. Haryana Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondent-DHBVN *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of memo dated 24.12.2025 whereby memo dated 16.12.2025 has been withdrawn. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that impugned order dated 24.12.2025 (Annexure P-9) has been passed beyond jurisdiction and is contrary to previous order dated 16.12.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-DHBVN submits that petitioners may approach Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum which would consider their grievance and pass an appropriate order within two weeks from the date of filing application. The said authority would consider every issue raised by petitioners and grant them opportunity of hearing. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.06 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-13935-2026 -2- 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners agrees to the aforesaid statement. 5. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE May 06, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.06 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document