M/S AMMA CONSTRUCTION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. SRI N P BALARAJ
CCC/839/2025 · 2026-03-04
C M Poonacha
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6865 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6865 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13314-DB CCC No. 839 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 839 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
M/S AMMA CONSTRUCTION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1965) 3RD FLOOR, 149/A, HOTEL VIRAT 20TH MAIN, 1ST 'R' BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010 (REPRESENTED BY SRI N.T. VEERESH DIRECTOR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O LATE VEERANNA N.T.) …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI SANATH KUMAR A., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI N P BALARAJ CHIEF ENGINEER KARNATAKA SLUM DEVELOPMENT BOARD NO. 55, RISALDAR STREET SHESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE - 560 020
2.
DR. ASHOK DR COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA SLUM DEVELOPMENT BOARD NO. 55, RISALDAR STREET
Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13314-DB CCC No. 839 of 2025
SHESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE - 560 020 …ACCUSED (BY SRI PATIL BHEEMANGOUDA BASANAGOUDA, ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR THE WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 28.03.2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.35413/2024 C/W WRIT PETITION NO.35144/2024, PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The learned counsel appearing to the accused submits that the complainant has preferred an appeal against the order dated 28.03.2025 passed in WP.No.35413/2024 (T-RES) c/w
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13314-DB CCC No. 839 of 2025
W.P.No.35144/2024 (T-RES), the disobedience of which is alleged. He also states that the said order was passed relying upon a decision in WP.No.25439/2023, which is also the subject matter of an appeal before this Court.
2. Given the nature of the order, we consider it apposite to close the present complaint, with liberty to the complainant to revive the same or file afresh, subject to the outcome of the pending appeals.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
SD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13