[2026:RJ-JP:11207] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4329/2026 Abdul Jalil S/o Hafiz Allaudin, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Shikar Ganj Karauli, Tehsil And District Karauli, Rajasthan ----Petitioner-Plaintiff Versus 1. Kalyan Mali S/o Dulli Mali, Aged About 73 Years, Resident Of Shikar Ganj Karauli, Tehsil And District Karauli, Rajasthan 2. Smt. Santo W/o Girraj, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Basant Gurj, Karauli, Tehsil And District Karauli, Rajasthan 3. Smt. Mina W/o Hansraj Mali, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Kaharpura Vugdar, Tehsil Mandarayal And District Karauli, Rajasthan 4. Charan S/o Hardev Mali, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Dafalpur, Tehsil And District Karauli, Rajasthan 5. Smt. Geeta W/o Babu Lal, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Ghatghadi Ka Zone Mandarayal, Tehsil Mandarayal, District Karauli, Rajasthan 6. Smt. Chandro W/o Roshan, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Shikar Ganj Karauli, Tehsil And District Karauli, Rajasthan 7. Ramraj S/o Narayan Meena, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Mahaton Ka Pura, Tehsil And District Karauli, Rajasthan ----Non-Petitioner-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amir Aziz For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 17/03/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 03.09.2025, passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Karauli, whereby the document dated 04.10.2004, being an agreement to sell, has been impounded and sent to the competent authority for the purpose of determination and payment of appropriate stamp duty. [2026:RJ-JP:11207] (2 of 2) [CW-4329/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is an apprehension that the concerned authority may levy stamp duty as per the rates prevailing on the present date, instead of those applicable on the date of execution of the agreement. 3. This Court finds that the apprehension expressed by the petitioner is premature; therefore, no ground is made out to interfere with the impugned order dated 03.09.2025. 4. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge any order passed by the competent authority before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law. 5. With the above observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 6. All pending application stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J KRATIKA /14